If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

피고인은 2020. 1. 1. 15:20경 홍성군 B에 있는 ‘C’에서 ‘주취자가 행패를 부린다’는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 홍성경찰서 D지구대 소속 경위 E으로부터 귀가를 권유받자, 화가 나 손으로 때릴 듯이 위협하고 ‘니들이 뭔데, 이래라 저래라냐’라고 소리치며 소지하고 있던 휴대전화로 위 E의 코를 2회 가량 치고, 계속하여 위 현장에서 공무집행방해죄로 현행범인으로 체포되어 D지구대로 인치되어 오던 중 D지구대 앞에서 발로 위 E의 다리 뒷부분을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of official duties, such as reporting processing duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E police statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which prevents the Defendant from performing his/her official duties by assaulting the police officer, is the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant.

However, considering the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, the degree of violence is not severe, and the crime of this case does not belong to the police officers who suffered damage due to the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case shall be determined as ordered.