2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects on the fact that the defendant committed the crime, that the defendant was the first offender who has no record of punishment, that the defendant was not a person entitled to basic living security, and that there is no economic condition as a beneficiary of basic living security, etc. However, although the defendant continuously expressed a desire to the victim among many people in the bus driving by the victim, that the victim seems to have caused considerable aggravation and sense of shame due to the defendant's abusivement, and that the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim and did not make a minimum effort to reach an agreement, and that the defendant did not make a minimum effort to reach an agreement, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, such as age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his defense of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.