2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of the crime of this case and the Defendant’s response to a mistake and cooperation in the investigation, the crime of this case needs to be strictly punished and eradicated in light of the addiction to narcotics and the harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc. Meanwhile, the Defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crimes, especially the Defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment for the same criminal acts, in particular, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment for a repeated crime due to the same criminal act, and the Defendant’s criminal records and the Defendant’s maternity ingredients were detected, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there is no other special circumstances or changes in circumstances that might be newly considered after the sentence of the lower court, and considering all the records and arguments of this case including the Defendant’s age, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s punishment of this case is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.