협박
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the father of the victim E, and the father of the victim F, the victim F's father and the victim F were able to drink G and drinking, and the defendants, the victims, the wife of the defendants, and the other victims' relatives were gathered in front of the I convenience point in the Gwangju Mine District H.
A. Defendant B, before the I convenience store on June 6, 2016, the Defendant, while referring to the victim F, etc. before the I convenience store, committed an indecent act on the victim’s drinking and sexual intercourse.
If the victim does not speak as correct, he/she threatened the victim by saying that he/she is dead of a punishment that is later than the latter.
B. Defendant A threatened the victim with the victim E, etc., who was at the same place as G at the same time, on the ground that there was a de facto dispute with the victim E, etc., and thereby, the victim’s “patching the human being.”
2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, since the legal representative of the victims of this case was recognized that he/she expressed his/her intention not to punish each of the Defendants after the prosecution, all of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.