However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 8, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the road in front of the “D pharmacy” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. “D’s pharmacy” was under the influence of alcohol to F, a police officer affiliated with the police box of the Seoul mid-gu Police Station Emba, who called at the site after receiving a report 112, who was under the direction of 112, and was under the influence of alcohol to F, a police officer affiliated with the police box of the Seoul mid-gu Seoul Central Police Station Emba, “I sphere this sphere, I sphere, I sphere, and assaulted F,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 report.

2. The Defendant, on the ground that the victim G, a police officer affiliated with the police box affiliated with the Seoul Central Police Station Epis, dispatched with the above F at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, controlled the Defendant, was a large sound of about 20 people in the presence of approximately 20 people, and whether this year, the Defendant’s friende, was unable to commit the larceny, and the police officer was assigned to the Defendant;

In this regard, this year’s Meetology, “I” and so forth.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act: The crime of this case is committed by the defendant to a police officer who is performing official duties without any reason, in light of the circumstances, method, etc., of the crime; circumstances where the crime of this case was committed by the defendant; circumstances favorable to the fact that the defendant had a record of the same kind of crime: the defendant committed the crime of this case; the defendant's mistake when he was committed; the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case; the fact that there was no criminal record exceeding the fine; the circumstances mentioned above are the reasons why the defendant caused the crime