2. The facts that the defendant led to the confession, part of the damage amount caused by the fraud of this case was recovered, and the equality with the case of concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of obstruction of execution of deceptive scheme which became final and conclusive in the judgment of the court below. However, the defendant committed obstruction of execution of deceptive scheme of this case again even though he had the record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the same criminal act of the same kind. The defendant committed obstruction of execution of deceptive scheme of this case. There was no agreement with the victim that considerable part of the damage amount caused by fraud of this case was not recovered and there was no agreement with the victim. In full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive, means and method of the crime of this case,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.