However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

[Fact-finding] Defendants were those who were active as members of the past D, and in the past D in the past D, 300 to 500 won of cash-free shop merchants, such as clocks, were dismantled in 2008 while managing the market by individually walking 30 to 500 won.

However, even though the above D was dissatised, the Defendants conspired to collect money by using the fact that 70% of the street keepers who harvested and sold small-scale crops, etc. were living in the satisfy with the 70-80 large-scale old-scale older persons living in the satisfy, Defendant A decided to manage the passbook of money that he collected, etc., and Defendant B decided to collect money from Defendant A together with Defendant A.

[2] Around August 5, 2009, the Defendants, on the street near the Gwangju Bank located in Shynam-dong (hereinafter referred to as "the victim E, who is 76 years of age"), she saw the victim's street in front of the victim's street, and saw the victim's street "on the other side, so that he does not know her own street," and Defendant B also saw the victim's hand by blocking the front of the street, thereby provokinging the victim's hand, and putting the victim's hand over, such as "as soon as possible..........."

The Defendants received KRW 500 from the victims of frighten, namely, a delivery of KRW 500 from frighten for the head of frighten, and received a total of KRW 35,974,00 in the above way as indicated in the attached crime sight table from around 2016 to around 23, 205.

As a result, the defendant received property from the victims separately.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police seizure records;

1. Details of passbook transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the photographs of divesphofs;

1. The Defendants of the pertinent Article 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 350 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.