When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 22:00 on February 2, 2020, the Defendant: (a) took a bath for the victim C(n, 41 years of age) and the victim of the marina, who had a good appraisal, and (b) took a bath for the victim, and (c) took a part of the victim’s breath as his hand, and breath with the victim’s breath, carried a breath, and boomed the victim’s breath, resulting in the victim’s breath, resulting in the Defendant’s injury to the breath, which requires approximately two-

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement by the police of some of the defendant and D's legal statement D

1. Each legal statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant asserted that the victim’s breath part of the victim’s breath was satisfyed once against the victim’s assault, but there was no satching and satching of the victim, and even if satching, the causal relationship with the injury cannot be recognized. The Defendant’

2. Comprehensively taking account of the above evidence and records and arguments duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant's act cannot be deemed as a justifiable act in light of the background and degree of the assault and injury of the defendant, and the following circumstances.

The Defendant stated in this court that he first sealed the part of the victim by hand when the victim did not write his son at the above restaurant ma, and she pushed himself by his body without taking his son’s hand.

The victim and witness E consistently stated in the investigative agency and this court that the defendant was sprinking and shaking the victim's head, and according to the defendant's husband's statement at the investigative agency "C", the defendant's husband's work partner, the victim and witness E spherbling.