1. According to the records on Defendant A’s grounds of appeal, the Defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and asserted a mistake of facts, along with the grounds of appeal, on the second trial of the lower court, and withdrawn the assertion of mistake of facts on the grounds of unfair sentencing, and left only the grounds of unfair sentencing as grounds of appeal.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by mistake of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, or incomplete hearing cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Furthermore, even upon examining records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant B in light of the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on causation in fraud or the occurrence of damages, or failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.