When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 14:05 on August 13, 2017, the Defendant damaged the user D, operated by Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu Seoul, to use signboards with a length of 50cm and length of 1m in hand, which are located front of the main point on the ground that F, an employee at the main point, is not bad, by prohibiting the Defendant from having access, thereby making the Defendant use the signboards in front of the main point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant did not and again committed a crime despite the majority of the criminal records of the same kind of crime, shall be subject to criticism.

However, the defendant does not commit a second offense.

The sentencing factors, such as the fact that there is an agreement with the victim, the degree of damage to property, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, etc., shall be determined as per the order.