판결등무효확인
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part regarding each of the judgments in [Attachment 2] Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the [Attachment 2] List shall be dismissed.
2...
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The defendant is entitled to finally determine the judgment at the church and the church under its jurisdiction as the highest church of the B religious organization church (integrated order) and to interpret the religious order constitution. B religious organization C church of the religious organization (hereinafter “instant church”).
(2) The plaintiff (appointed party, hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff") is a person who was the head of the church of this case, the selected parties E, F, and G are the head of the church of this case, and H is a person who was appointed as the delegated member of the defendant church on October 2010 and was on the duty of the defendant church.
B. The judgment in [Attachment 2] Nos. 3 and 6 of the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 of the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 of the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 1 of the separate sheet Nos. 3 and 6 of the separate sheet Nos. 2 of the instant church constituted the ice Committee to hear the delegated pastor on March 20
After that, H, following the resolution of the Council on August 29, 2010 of the instant church, and the resolution of the Joint Council on September 26, 2010 of the instant church, was examined as a delegating pastor, and as the D Union approved H on October 24, 201, it was appointed as a delegating pastor of the instant church.
② On the other hand, H submitted a resume to the ice Council of the instant church on January 1, 1997 through March 3, 2010, stating that the part of the work experience was “the period during which H had been on the part of the instant church ice ice Council and had been on the part of the instant church ice Council during which H had been on the day off from January 2003 to December 2007, since it continued to have been on the day after having been on the day after having been on the day off from January 2003 to December 2007, and had been on the part of the said church ice Council, including the period during which H had on the part of the said church ice, entered the low-income church ice and had been on the part of the said church ice.” In other words, H retired from the ice Council of the instant church on March 2008, and had been on the part of the said church ice as being on the part of the said church ice.