건물명도(인도)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the third or eight grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are brought about as stated in the following paragraph (2).
2. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap's evidence Nos. 2, 3, 10, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), the lessor of the instant lease agreement provides that the lessor may repay the amount of the down payment and cancel the contract. Defendant Eul, the co-owner of the instant store, who had the authority to conclude the instant lease agreement on behalf of the defendant C, etc., as the husband of the defendant C, who was the co-owner of the instant store, had the right to conclude the instant lease on behalf of the defendant C, etc. on several occasions before the Plaintiff transferred the remainder amount of the instant lease agreement to the account under the name of the defendant C, and expressed his intention to refund the down payment to the plaintiff and cancel the instant lease contract. In order for the plaintiff to receive the down payment from the hospital operated by the defendant Eul, or to refund the down payment to the plaintiff's account, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendants refused to pay the down payment to the plaintiff.
On the other hand, it is not necessary to deposit it (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 91Da2151, May 12, 1992). It is deemed that the instant lease contract was legally rescinded in accordance with Article 5 of the instant lease contract.
Therefore, it is true.