However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a G K9 car.

On December 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver's license of a motor vehicle on December 21, 2015, and went back to the front of the 12-ro 12 overseas church in Ansan-si. In the intersection, the Defendant moved to the third distance of the dormitory from the area of the Green church to the third distance of the dormitory from the area of the Green church.

At the time, there are nights and other vehicles driving along the intersection, so the defendant, who is engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to prevent the accident by properly manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led to the Defendant’s negligence by leaving the right side from the left side of the Defendant’s course to the right side, and the part on which the Defendant loaded the Defendant’s Ha (27 Doh) drive, and the part on which the Defendant loaded the freight, following the right side of the freight vehicle, was shocked into the part on the front part of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as light fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

2. On December 12, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as smelling and smelling at the K box located in the J of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si on December 22 and 15, 2015.

If there is a reasonable reason to determine a person, the police officer of the above police box did not comply with the request of the police officer to respond to the measurement of drinking by a breath measuring instrument, etc. from that time to 22:47 of the same day, he/she did not comply with the request for measurement of drinking by the breath measuring instrument.

Accordingly, the defendant is in a drunken state.

Even a person who has a substantial reason to be appointed, he/she did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol testing.

3. On December 21, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).