However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 5, 2016, at around 08:30 on the 1st floor of B building in light of light, without any special reason, the Defendant: (a) opened 2 bricks, which are dangerous objects brought by fire by fire; (b) opened the entrance entrance of public toilets owned by the victim C; (c) opened the strings; (d) opened the strings; and (e) damaged the strings to repair expenses on the market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of D and E;

1. Article 369 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 366 of the said Act (Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the accused has a criminal record of 11 times, and a criminal record of violence, including a damage which does not exceed a fine, is seven times among them, the crime of this case is intentional, and the damage has not been recovered) is above