However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 12:00 on May 18, 2016, the Defendant arrived at a destination, but did not get off the taxi at the port of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant moved to the C police station in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, B with the report of a taxi engineer at around 12:50 on the same day. After calculating the taxi fee, the Defendant was requested to return from Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, B police station C with the report of the taxi engineer at around 12:50 on the same day, but was rejected, and the Defendant was required to return the taxi from Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the

C. The above D, who reads the desire to keep the fla head “Woo,” and warns the punishment, expressed the desire to “Punishment, fla head,” and expressed D’s chest part by drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers' reports and case handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements made by shots E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify departments related to the receipt of a public official, the place of work, and the report of 112 case;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488