2. Determination takes into account that the Defendant’s mistake is divided, that the damaged goods were temporarily returned to the victims. However, the Defendant had the history of serving several times of punishment for the same kind of crime, each of the instant crimes was committed during the period of repeated crime, and the Defendant committed the crime committed on February 5, 2014 again after being investigated by an investigative agency on each of the crimes committed on January 23, 2014, and all of the conditions of punishment as shown in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, criminal background, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed to be heavy.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.