beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.17 2015나6379

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial room, is as follows.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 28, 2011, E driving a F car free on a 00:10 square meters (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and driving a f car free on the right side of the vehicle in front of the annual used car trade complex located in the south-gu Seoul metropolitan area in the middle of the port at the port of the port, and the place is in the vicinity of the intersection where the yellow point is destroyed, etc., and the vehicle is in front of the front section of the said vehicle due to negligence, the Plaintiff, who was crossinging the road from the right side of the road to the right side of the said vehicle, even though he was negligent in performing his duty of care to care to check the front side and the left side of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as a flaver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver laver la

B. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1 through 3, 7 (including tentative number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 1's entries and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident of this case as the insurer of the vehicle of this case.

B. However, the following circumstances recognized by the aforementioned evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, ① the instant accident was at least 00:10, a late time, and the Plaintiff was at the time, and ② the Plaintiff started to build a road through a crosswalk while under the influence of alcohol, but was crossinging the road by a shooting line beyond the above crosswalk at the time of the instant accident. ③ At the time of the accident, the vehicle signal, etc. was changed by yellow wave, etc., ③ At the time of the accident, the vehicle signal, etc. was changed by yellow wave, and the signal, etc. on the above crosswalk crossing of the Plaintiff was cut out, the Plaintiff is also proceeding well.