Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Although it is recognized that the defendant's judgment on the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is acknowledged that he has committed an offense, reflects errors, and considers equity in the case of concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., and the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the imprisonment of one year and six months), the court below seems to have already taken such favorable circumstances into account in sentencing, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime (the imprisonment of two years), the fact that the defendant has not been exchanged, the fact that the amount of money was not much, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, method and result, etc., the imprisonment (four months) of the court below is appropriate and too unreasonable.