사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;
A. The Defendant, who forged the loan certificate and exercised the same, was required to obtain a guarantee from husband E on condition that he borrowed money from the husband C (hereinafter “D”).
Using a seal, he had the intention to forge the loan certificate under the name of guarantor E at will.
Accordingly, on January 23, 2014, the Defendant promised to borrow KRW 0,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the “G” office located in Jeju-si, by means of a computer network protocol, from the “G” office, as part of January 23, 2014, for repayment by December 31, 2014.
On January 23, 2014, "the date of preparation", the name, resident registration number, and address of the defendant in the borrower column shall be stated, and the name, resident registration number, and address of E in the guarantor column shall be stated, and the output shall be printed and held next to the name of E of the guarantor E;
E’s seal was affixed.
Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged a copy of the borrowed loan certificate in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority, and delivered it to C at H shopping underground on the same day.
In addition, from that time to March 27, 2015, the Defendant forged four copies of the instrument borrowed in the name of E, a private document concerning rights and obligations, in the same manner four times in total, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, and exercised the same.
B. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) forged a letter of delegation for certification of seal imprint and the Defendant’s exercise of that right used the remainder of the public auction of forest land delivered to the effect that the Defendant would be replaced by her husband E for payment on behalf of her husband; (b) voluntarily appropriated the remainder of the public auction of the land in question due to the Defendant’s repayment of other obligations; and (c) caused the payment deadline for the remainder of the public auction of the land in question; and (d) arbitrarily sold part of the
Accordingly, the defendant is under L on October 21, 2015.