특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case does not seem to be significant is the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant.
However, in full view of the factors of sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant and other various factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, such as the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment three times for the same type of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and that there was no agreement with the victims or no damage has been restored, etc., the sentence of the lower court is adequate.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.