A. As to KRW 69,196,246 and KRW 65,743,475 among them, Defendant A Co., Ltd., from July 24, 2015 to KRW 65,743,475.

2. The judgment based on the presumption of confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, Defendant C, through a written reply from March 15, 2016, merely asserted that the liability is limited since the qualified acceptance was made with respect to the inheritance of the deceased D’s property, and did not claim dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim. The Plaintiff accepted the qualified acceptance claim by the above Defendant, and reduced the purport of the claim. Accordingly, the above Defendant did not dispute the modified purport of the claim. Thus, the above Defendant is considered to have led to confession as to the changed purport of the claim and the cause of the claim).