A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

A is a person who has served as the head of E-high school administrative office located in D in the Gu of Changwon-si from July 2002 to September 5, 2012, and Defendant B is a person employed as an employee of the above E-high school administrative office around 2002 and served as the head of the administrative office from around 2008, the head of the administrative office from September 6, 2012.

1. Defendant A

A. On February 6, 2011, the Defendant would be able to transfer money to a full-time teacher if he/she lends money to the president of the Foundation to a full-time teacher because it is difficult for the president of the Foundation to conduct a business in the United States because he/she was unable to operate the business in the U.S. at the time.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he was planned to use the defendant's personal debt repayment and living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to convert the injured party into regular teachers.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 100 million from the injured party on the same day, and obtained the delivery of KRW 40 million on September 6, 2012, and KRW 100 million.

B. On January 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) called the head of H high school administrative office B at the time, and offered that “G weather conditions are difficult; (b) would be good if G weather would have seen a question about the selection examination of fixed-term teachers; and (c) obtained the consent of B, thereby inducing B to call the issue of the fixed-term teacher examination to G.

Accordingly, B around January 14, 2013, according to the above-mentioned interference teachers of the Defendant, issued to G the examination questions for the selection of fixed-term teachers who received from the teachers in charge of preparing examination questions.

As a result, the defendant assisted the school juristic person C to interfere with the selection of fixed-term teachers by fraudulent means.

2. Defendant B complies with the same request as the above 1-B statement.