beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2014.12.16 2014나4682

건축주명의변경동의 무효확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "the result of the inquiry into the office of Ulsan Metropolitan City, Nam-gu Office of the court of the first instance" in Section 4, 17, and 18 of the first instance judgment; "the result of the inquiry into the office of the office of the office of the Nam-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City in the second instance" in Sections 5, 11, and 12, "the result of the inquiry into the company of the first instance" in Sections 5, 11, and 12 are as follows: "the result of the inquiry into the company of the first instance with the company of the company of the first instance"; and therefore, it is identical to the part of the reasons of the first instance judgment, except

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.