급배수관로철거
1. The claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Seongdong-gu, Yangyang-gu B (hereinafter “instant land”), and the Defendant is the local government that manages the water supply and sewerage system.
B. The instant land is abutting on the land owned by Nonparty C and the land owned by the Plaintiff, and around 198, the joint water supply pipes for supplying the water to the buildings located in each land owned by the Plaintiff, C, and the joint water supply pipes for supplying the water to the buildings located in each land owned by the Plaintiff, and the joint water supply pipes for C, and the Plaintiff supplied the water to the Plaintiff, using the pipes thereafter.
C. Around 2014, G, a child of the Plaintiff, donated the F land divided into the above Goyang-gu E and the above land, and newly constructed a building on the same day. The said Plaintiff and G applied for water supply construction in order to supply water to the newly constructed building.
Accordingly, the defendant connects the existing pipelines that supply water supply systems to the newly installed common supply pipelines, while replacing the existing common pipelines.
However, as above, the new common water supply pipe was located in the land of this case, and as a result, part of the conduits connected to the building C in the above common pipelines passed through the land of this case.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff asserts that the branch conduits connected from the joint water supply pipes to the C-owned building pass through the instant land without the Plaintiff’s consent, and seeks to remove the part of the attached drawings indicating the water supply pipes corresponding to the various water supply pipes connected to the C-owned building from the joint water supply pipes to the C-owned building.
Around 198, the Defendant had already installed a main pipeline connected to the Plaintiff and the land owned by C with the consent of C and the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff.