The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the violation of the present building and fire prevention among the facts charged in the instant case, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation

In addition, considering various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the determination of the lower court’s punishment that upheld the first instance judgment that sentenced 17 years to imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendant cannot be deemed extremely unfair even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the defense counsel.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.