beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고단7627

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2014, the Defendant came to know that he was a Chinese guest, a Chinese guest, who found the above main points around November 26, 2015.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic;

A. On November 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received USD 10,000 from 21,000 from the above main points to the main points for E’s commercial sex acts; and (b) engaged in commercial sex acts by doing sexual intercourse with E in the hotel rooms located in the same building as the above main points.

B. On December 4, 2015, the Defendant received USD 10,000 from the above main points to the main points for E’s sexual traffic at around 20:30, and engaged in sexual traffic by doing sexual intercourse with E in the hotel rooms located in the same building as the above main points, among USD 21,000, red bean ($ 1,500,000).

(c)

On December 14, 2015, the Defendant found in the guest rooms administered by E in F hotel located in F hotel located in Mcaro, and received USD 100,000 from E, and engaged in sexual intercourse by engaging in sexual intercourse.

(d)

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant received USD 10,000 from the 21,00 red bean ($ 1,500,000,000) from the above main points to the main points of E as the price for sexual traffic, and engaged in sexual intercourse with E in the sexual intercourse in the G hotel room in Makao.

2. Around December 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around December 16, 2015, at the passenger room of the above G hotel, the victim E suffered a lot of damages from shopping mall in Korea.

There has been no choice but to repay the dispute.

The amount of debt is about KRW 2 million from the 1500,000 ($ 250,000,000,000) to the Han River ($ 300,000,000).

Marriage will be married at the time of liquidation.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not engage in the shopping mall business in Korea, and there was no occurrence, and even if the victim was liquidated, he did not intend to marry with the victim.

The defendant.