상습절도등
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
1. The first instance court found the Defendant guilty of all the charges of habitual larceny, the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon a house on December 19, 2014, the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon a house on February 11, 2015, the crime of intrusion upon a house on March 9, 2015 (No. 2015No. 86), and two years of imprisonment, the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon a house on October 12, 2012, and the crime of intrusion upon a house on February 15, 2013 (No. 2015No. 293) were sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months.
As to this, the Supreme Court appealed on the part concerning habitual larceny for which two years have been sentenced to imprisonment, the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon residence of December 19, 2014, the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon residence of February 11, 2015, and the crime of intrusion upon residence of March 9, 2015, the scope of this Court’s judgment is limited [the records show that according to the records, the defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny from the Daejeon District Court Hongsung branch on January 6, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 5, 2012 (No. 145, 146 of the evidence record), and thus, the summary of the judgment of the court below as to each of the crimes (No. 2015Da293, Oct. 12, 2012 and the crime of causing property damage and intrusion upon residence of March 20, 2015).
3. The judgment of the defendant reflects his/her family's depth while he/she gets suffering from his/her own mistake, and the defendant actively treats and again does not stop the same crime. The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in a state of mental disorder due to nautical miles disorder, etc., the victim L completely recovers damaged goods, and the amount of damage.