손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On October 20, 2016, the Plaintiff was proposed to receive support from D of the Hague Hunter Company (C) for the position of the financial director (CFO) to be employed by the Defendant.
The Plaintiff submitted a letter of support for employment of curriculum vitae, etc. to the Defendant via D through a document review, and followed the first video interview around November 3, 2016 with employees of the U.S. head office and the second video interview around November 10, 2016, and the second video interview around 7:30 a.m. on November 10, 2016.
On November 11, 2016, the plaintiff had an interview with the head of the Korean branch office in the defendant's office at around 2:00 p.m. and had employees introduced.
On the other hand, the plaintiff and the head of the defendant's Korean branch office discussed the time when the plaintiff can start work at the time of the above interview, and during that process, the plaintiff asked that he can start work at the time of December 12, 2016.
On November 24, 2016, upon receiving the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendant sent to D the terms and conditions of the Plaintiff’s employment-related wages, etc., and D sent them to the Plaintiff on November 25, 2016.
The plaintiff asked D, among the terms of employment, whether he/she is unable to receive a worker at that time because he/she included his/her annual leave during the period of probation (three months) and excluded the general welfare program. D, however, he/she delivered the plaintiff's inquiry to the defendant, but E, the head of the defendant's Korean branch office, sent the answer that it is difficult for D to do so.
D On November 29, 2016, the Plaintiff sent again the terms of employment that the Defendant initially presented to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff sent to D e-mail that it would accept the terms of employment of the Defendant on the same day.
In addition, the Plaintiff expressed his intention to retire as of December 12, 2016 to the company that worked on the same day.
However, on the ground that the plaintiff asked about the terms and conditions of employment, the defendant's decision to suspend the plaintiff's employment procedure was made, and D sent to the plaintiff on December 1, 2016 information about the issue related to the defendant and sent the information about the employment of the other company (F).
The plaintiff.