[2016 Highest 460] The Defendant is a person who runs a mobile phone sales store with the trade name of D from July 2013 to March 2015.

1. On December 20, 2013, the Defendant forged an application for entering a mobile phone in the name of E using personal information, such as the name, address, resident registration number, etc. that he/she came to know in the process of opening a mobile phone at the aforementioned mobile phone sales store, and thought that he/she has raised his/her new mobile phone opening performance by using the same.

Accordingly, the Defendant arbitrarily entered “E”, “F” in the resident registration number column, “M” in the main disturbance, and “E” in the applicant column with a black tool in the application form for joining the mobile phone in custody (E) and forged an application form for joining the mobile phone under the name of E by signing his/her signature on the right side of the name of E.

In addition, the Defendant sent an application for subscription to a forged E mobile phone at the above time and at the above place, by facsimile, to a staff in charge of opening mobile phones with which the name of the KT company is unknown who was unaware of the forgery.

In addition, from the above day to March 19, 2015, the Defendant forged a letter of application for entry of a mobile phone consisting of seven persons, such as E, a private document related to rights and obligations, at the above place, as described in paragraph 1 of the attached Table I, and exercised the same.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, submitted an application for entry of a forged mobile phone in the name of E to K, thereby opening the mobile phone, and runs as if he/she had ordinarily opened the mobile phone to an employee of the victim M&S affiliated with the victim, a mobile phone distributor, who is aware of such fact.