However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 5, 2016, around 22:20, the Defendant driven B deel Epia under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.253% from approximately 10 meters from the front of the 41 CU convenience store, a 41 CU convenience store, a 52-ro, Yon-si, Yancheon-si, Yancheon-si, to the front of the same road in front of the same way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account circumstances favorable to the defendant);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( considered circumstances favorable to the defendant);

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the favorable sentencing factors such as the following: (a) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration was high at the time of driving of the instant drinking alcohol; and (b) the Defendant was sentenced twice to a fine due to drinking; (c) the distance was not long; (d) the Defendant’s mistake was against himself; and (e) the Defendant’s economic difficulty was difficult.