beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.24 2016노6088

무고등

Text

All the judgment below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and two months.

Defendant

B 1,000.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendants’ written statements are considered only to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed.

1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles - With respect to each accusation and perjury, H Co., Ltd., the representative director of which is the defendant A, was delegated with the authority to execute and execute the new construction and sale of the house in AM at the time J and K model. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to each of the above Defendants’ respective charges of unfair sentencing as it did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles or misunderstanding of legal principles on the title of H Co., Ltd. used by J and K in civil litigation with H Co., Ltd. with H Co., Ltd. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17070, Apr. 1, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17134, Feb. 28, 2003; Presidential Decree No. 17450, Mar. 4, 2003; Presidential Decree No. 20650, Mar. 6, 2003; Presidential Decree No. 2010, Mar. 16, 2001).

B. The above punishment sentenced by the prosecutor by the court below to the defendants is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles

A. According to each evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following facts can be acknowledged.