도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal: (a) the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant; and (b) the mother who is treating dementia is the defendant.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes is deemed to have failed to comply with a police officer’s request for measurement of alcohol without justifiable cause while driving a motor vehicle without a driver’s license. In the past, the Defendant has several records of punishment (4 times a fine) due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, or a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on several occasions. On September 14, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.), and on April 20, 2010, the Defendant did not appear to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three months as a crime of perjury and the execution of the sentence on June 12, 2011, and the Defendant did not appear to have been sentenced to punishment again prior to the completion of pleadings and other circumstances of each of the instant crimes. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not appear to have any reason behind the completion of the Defendant’s punishment.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.