공유물분할
1. Of the forest land 23,802 square meters in Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Cheongyang-gun, each point of which is indicated in the annexed drawing Nos. 1 through 31, 39 through 49, and 1.
1. Basic facts
A. O, Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff D, Plaintiff E, Plaintiff F, Plaintiff’s husband P, Defendant J’s husband Q Q, Defendant K’s husband Q, Defendant L, Defendant L, S, and T (hereinafter the above persons referred to as the “instant alumni group”) were in a high school co-ownership relationship with each other, and if the conditions were allowed after purchasing land in Simb on or around June 20, 1986, the Plaintiff purchased the land in a high school, and then gather opinions to live together. Around June 20, 1986, around 23,80 square meters and N80,331 square meters (hereinafter the “each forest of this case”), and when two lands are divided, the land of this case is divided into the parcel number, and the land of this case and the land of this case shall be named as the land of this case) were purchased as the co-ownership of shares in the name of the Plaintiff under the name of the respective circumstances.
B. Since then, Plaintiff F purchased shares in each of the instant forest land on December 16, 2013, and Plaintiff F acquired U shares in each of the instant forest land at the auction procedure on January 24, 2014, and Plaintiff F and Plaintiff B’s share in each of the instant forest land became 2/14, respectively.
C. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants (if the husbands of Plaintiffs A, G, Defendant J, and Defendant K’s respective husbands do not need to be specifically divided into high school and their husbands, referring to the Plaintiffs and the Defendants for convenience) were not engaged in special conduct, such as setting up the housing in each of the instant forests and fields, from the acquisition of each of the instant forests and fields to the closing date of the pleadings, and the Plaintiffs want to divide each of the instant forests and fields where time flows thereafter, but no agreement has been reached between the Defendants on the method of dividing each of the instant forests and fields.
[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2-4-1, and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings]
2. The parties' assertion and judgment
A. The Parties’ assertion 1.