A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A

A. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant destroyed 22:00 on September 22, 2014, the Defendant destroyed 2:2:00 and 3,000 won lower of the market price by 3,00 won, which is the victim’s possession on the instant table, in which the victim E talks about matters of dissatisfaction with respect to Company B, a company partner, and the company business, etc. within the multi-face operated by the victim E.

B. Special obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and place as above; (b) on the ground that G of the F District District of the Sinung Police Station, who was dispatched to the said E with the said E 112 report, and the K of the G of the Sinung Police Station, and the K of the G of the G of the Sinung Police Station, were trying to hear only the horses of the said E and investigate the instant case; and (c) one kitchen, which is a dangerous object in the said multilateral bank (31cm in total, 18cm in total, 16.5cm in total) and one excessive (26.5cm in total) (10cm in total, 21cm in length, 10cm in blade in total), used the said police officer as his hand, and interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s report on the handling of his duties by assaulting the said dangerous objects.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property at the same time and place as that of the above 1-A, and in the situation of the above disturbance, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the above victim E’s market price equivalent to KRW 120,000,000.

B. While the Defendant committed the above A’s acts as referred to in Article 1(b), the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties by committing assaulting the police officer on the ground that police officers were not able to easily see the horses, and committing assaulting the above G and H, i.e., serving as drinking in a manner that the police officers were not able to see the horses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement related to E, H and G;

1. Application of seizure records and photographs of seized articles to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;