A. The Plaintiff, a company running a business of manufacturing phrases, office supplies, wholesale retail, etc., imported ice steel fruits from Japanese company C, and manufactures the pentin Pi (the metal portion in the straight line with the length of over 1cc from the end of the pentin Pi, the upper end of the pentin pent), and the Defendant is a customs service corporation performing customs duties, such as the classification of the tariff classification numbers (hereinafter “three numbers”) and tariff rates for exported and imported goods, the verification of dutiable value, and the calculation of the amount of customs duties.

B. On July 5, 2004, the Plaintiff: (a) imported fruits (hereinafter “Freeow”) using as the material of the Boll Shell; (b) delegated the customs clearance to a D Customs Brokers Corporation; and (c) D Customs Brokers Corporation had affiliated E-customs brokers take charge of customs clearance duties.

E on July 5, 2004, while performing customs clearance, filed an import declaration with customs office on the condition that no customs duty is to be paid as the tariff rate of Nos. 723.00-000 [Stetragrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgs] among the tariff classification set forth in the tariff schedule set forth in the Tariff Schedule set forth in the Customs Duties Act. The above excess customs clearance was cleared free of duty.

C. On December 3, 2012, the Plaintiff imported a product cut back of the instant product in a straight line (2.30 meters in diameter, 11.5 meters in length, hereinafter “instant product”) along with a domination, and delegated the customs clearance of the instant product to E, and issued a seal sheet and packaging specifications of the instant product.

E On December 7, 2012, customs offices filed an import declaration that there is no customs duty according to classifying the tariff classification of the instant goods as “Article 723.00-000,” and the instant goods were cleared free of duty.

E was appointed as the defendant's director on February 15, 2013.

After the Plaintiff was appointed as the Defendant’s director, the Plaintiff delegated customs clearance to the Defendant while importing the instant goods, and the Defendant had the Defendant take charge of such duties.

E.