However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On July 29, 1986, the Defendant brought a lawsuit, such as divorce, against the victim C on June 27, 2012, and divorced on June 3, 2013 through a court decision in lieu of divorce mediation.

In a lawsuit such as divorce, etc., the Defendant submitted a written contract, etc. prepared as if the victim sold KRW 85 million on February 13, 2013, which was owned by the Defendant, to obtain compulsory execution against the property owned by the Defendant from the victim, such as the provisional seizure of the property owned by the Defendant, for the purpose of evading compulsory execution against the property owned by the Defendant. On February 14, 2013, the Suwon District Court Seosung Branch of the Suwon District Court, which was located in Sungsung-si, the Defendant’s Republic of Korea, was selling to D of the second floor No. 208 of the 102 E Apartment-si, Busan Metropolitan City, which was owned by the Defendant, and subsequently transferred the registration of ownership transfer in the above D name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant or D;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Search, seizure, verification warrant and response materials;

1. Investigation report (the results of checking and investigating the details of transactions);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the President of the Korea Credit Union and President of the General Loans;

1. Article 327 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record and fine, and that the victim seems to recover part of damage due to the lawsuit seeking revocation of fraudulent act);