A A The fine of 500,000 won, the fine of 700,000 won, and the fine of 1,000,000 won, respectively, shall be imposed on Defendant B.

D is a person who engages in unregistered loan brokerage business in the name of "G" in the name of "F" in Seoul Special Metropolitan City E 402, and H and I are employees of the above "G".

J is a person who engages in loan brokerage business under the trade name of "L" in 113 of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K Building 113.

The Defendants are applicants for loans to which they applied to the above G.

The person who has failed to obtain the name is a false loan document forgery business operator, such as the certificate of employment of the loan applicant and the details of passbook payment.

1. Defendant A, in collusion with D, J, H, and I, had a person without a certain occupation and had the completion of the work, had the Defendant applied for a loan to the lending company and received the loan from the lending company.

Defendant

A did not receive a certain amount of wages at all while in office M.

Nevertheless, around May 16, 2010, Defendant A applied for a loan as if he/she works for M with no actual working-related work-related work-related work-related work-related work-related work-related work-related work-related at the loan brokerage office of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government N3 N., and was called as if he/she was paid monthly certain wages when he/she was in office for M.

As such, Defendant A, by deceiving a person in charge of loans, deposited KRW 1 million in his/her own account under the name of his/her own account and immediately withdrawn KRW 300,000 in cash through an automatic cash instrument and delivered it to D.

As a result, Defendant A, in collusion with D, the above-mentioned person, J, H, and I, got the loan of KRW 1 million through the loan application and acquired it by deceiving the person in charge of the loan of the credit service company as if he received certain benefits in M.

2. Defendant B conspired with D, J, H, and I even with the knowledge that the passbook was forged with a person without a certain occupation, Defendant B submitted it to the lending company and received the loan and received the loan.

Defendant 1, 200.