2. The Defendants are fully aware of the facts of crime; the Defendants and some employees received certain education or qualification regarding marina activities through private organizations; Defendant A did not operate marina business establishment by submitting a report on closure of business on April 3, 2013; Defendant B was employed as an employee in the business establishment operated by Defendant A; however, there are favorable circumstances in favor of the Defendants, such as the size of marina business establishment operated by Defendant A; Defendant A operated the marina business establishment from October 208 to run the business establishment of this case; Defendant A had already been subject to criminal punishment of two times or fines (a fine of KRW 1 million, a fine of KRW 2 million, and a fine of KRW 2 million) for the same facts of crime in this case; Defendant A had already been subject to criminal punishment of the Defendants on the same age as the instant case; Defendant A had already been sentenced to a fine of KRW 100,000,000,000 before and after the crime committed on August 27, 2010; Defendant A had no further been subject to criminal punishment for the same type of punishment as Defendant 20.

3. Conclusion.