2. Provided, That for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a DNA driver who is put in the C Multi-household Construction Work, and the defendant B is a person in charge of the safety management of the said construction work as the head of the field office E belonging to the headquarters of the construction execution business of the said construction work.

On February 8, 2018, at the construction site of the above multi-household housing, the Defendants jointly carried out the work of cutting the ground from the above multi-household housing construction site on February 15, 2018. Defendant A, a driver of the Creck, had the above Berick work carried out using the cler on the ground from underground to put the cler on the ground (a 150cc high, 130cc high, 115cc high, and 1 ton). As such, Defendant A, a driver of the Crecler, had the cler well look at the front door and the left door and the left door; Defendant B, a driver of the Crecer, had the above cerick to check whether there was no person in the underground and secure safety; Defendant B started work on its own with no content in the original design and construction plan; Defendant B was stationed at the site; Defendant B did not take necessary measures to prevent the above cler from leaving the ground without any other worker’s duty of care in the underground and without any other worker’s fault.