beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.12.19 2014나37394

설계비

Text

1. The appeal against the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) and the claim extended in the trial of the case are dismissed, respectively.

2. Filing an appeal;

Reasons

1. The court of first instance dismissed both the plaintiff's main claim and the defendant's counterclaim. Accordingly, since only the plaintiff appealed against the defendant's claim for the service payment of the Seoul Seongbuk-gu G land among the main claim part, the object of the judgment by this court is limited to the above part among the main claim.

2. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where "50,000,000 won is used as part of the above service payment" in Part 5, 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "51,051,00 won, which is a part of the above service payment," and therefore, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and claim extended in the court of first instance against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.