The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

[criminal power] On June 24, 2020, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud and three years of suspended execution at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 2, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants, as so-called so-called “slicker,” had induced customers to enter into a contract by explaining other vehicles of a high amount on the grounds of defects, etc., and had them enter into a contract. After having been given a high amount of unjust enrichment under the pretext of brokerage fees, the Defendants informed customers of the amount less than the actual purchase price of vehicles for the purpose of brokerage fees, notified them that they do not receive brokerage fees, and then given notice that they do not receive brokerage fees, they did not receive the difference (the amount obtained by deducting the actual purchase price of vehicles from the total purchase price

On March 17, 2020, the Defendants reported the so-called “fabreged” advertisement to sell a vehicle of 12 million won or more by the Internet at “C” located in the Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, and led the victim D to buy another vehicle, “the above vehicle will be able to purchase another vehicle because ECO is good,” and displayed the victim’s vehicle to “the value of the vehicle is 12.8 million won or more, including the transfer cost,” and made a false statement to “the total purchase price of the vehicle is 14.8 million won or more.”

그러나 사실 위 차량의 실제 매매대금 시세는 830만원으로 피고인들이 실제로 얻는 알선 수수료 명목의 수익은 약 450만 원임에도 피고인들은 자동차양도증명서에 알선수수료를 전혀 받지 않는 것처럼 기재하고, 피해자에게 차량의 실제 매매대금을 고지하지 아니하는 방법으로 피해자를 속여 그 차액을 가로챌 생각이었다.

As above, the Defendants deceptioned the victim and obtained 14.8 million won on the same day from the victim, thereby deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police with D.