A and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and Defendant C by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, Defendant A, Defendant A, and Defendant.

1. Defendants A and B’s violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and the occupational and actual death Defendants are the employers who jointly supervise and supervise all the matters relating to the safety and health of workers while performing the new housing construction work in the Southern-gun F.

Business owners have the duty of care to check whether they were constructed according to design books in order to prevent risks, such as explosion, etc. before collapse due to load load, snow, wind pressure, earthquake, vibration, shock, etc., among persons with respect to structures or similar facilities.

Nevertheless, on September 22, 2016, the Defendants failed to verify whether the stairs slabs were constructed in accordance with the design drawings at the above construction site on September 13:30, 2016, and thus, the Defendants constructed the stairs slabs differently from the design drawings, thereby causing the victims G (5 years old)’s collapse, resulting in the victim’s death of the stairs slabs at the same site of the collapsed stairs slabs.

2. Violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act by Defendant B

A. Although a business owner is required to reinforce the structure with sufficient strength to take protective measures, such as safety railing, fences, vertical fall telescopes, or covers, at a place where a worker is at the risk of falling, as a end or opening part of the work launching and passage, the business owner is required to install a rail in the construction site around September 26, 2016. However, the Defendant did not install a rail at the outside slope of the construction site.

B. In the event that a business owner assembles a lecture bridge, he/she must take measures, such as using boomed steel products or installing a bottom boom by using sub-structures, etc. in order to prevent spreading or subsidence on the bridge, but the Defendant did not use the bottom boomed steel products on the north side of the construction site around September 26, 2016.

3. Defendant C-.