around 11:00 on February 23, 2018, the Defendant had cash 480,000 won, driving license, one copy of resident registration certificate, and one copy of credit card 3,000 won, which are owned by the victim D, operated by the victim D in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and 30,000 won at the market price.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s property was stolen from that time until March 27, 2018, and related to the damaged goods listed in the list of crimes No. 3 of the annexed crime list of the annexed crime. This part of the facts charged is “S8 when gallon gallon.” However, in light of the photographs, etc. of “S6 and S8” submitted by the Defendant’s side, the said damaged goods are “S6 when gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon gallon, so the victim is recognized as such (the victim is merely “the cellular phone when gallon gal

The total amount of KRW 2,775,000 was stolen on five occasions, such as the statement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, G, H, and I;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that "the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not commit a theft of damaged goods by using a spawn under the influence of alcohol" rather than "a theft of damaged goods by using a spawn under the influence of alcohol" in relation to the method of crime Nos. 3 of the annexed crime list, and that "the defendant and his/her defense counsel carried smartphones, which were carried out by using a smartphone in a place where he/she returned a wall borrowed from spawn as a place where he/she returned it."

On the other hand, however, the victim F was temporarily set up at the investigative agency about the cell phone, and there was no cell phone which occurred in a soup.

According to the Defendant’s assertion, “the victim puts his cell phone within the Defendant’s interest,” and there is no particular reason for the victim to do so.