The defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a business owner of "C Mazine in Osan-si B and 2."

The Defendant, from April 7, 2017 to the 30th of the same month, 120,000 won and 1.20,000 won were collected from customers who found the above location, and arranged commercial sex acts by having sexual intercourse with women D, E, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant or F;

1. Each statement of F, E, and D;

1. Each report on internal investigation (on-site control situation and evidence list 8);

1. Voluntary accompanying report;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act (Concurrent punishment of imprisonment and a fine under Article 24 of the same Act);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [the scope of the recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the period from June to one year) and the range of the comparison of recommended punishment with the basic area (from June to one year and four months): The period from June to one year and four months [the sentence] that there was no person subject to any special sentencing]: A normal situation unfavorable to the defendant: A second offense even though he had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same type of crime in 2014. The normal circumstances favorable to the defendant are recognized as erroneous and reflective. In addition, the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are not relatively long.