beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.01.24 2013고합311

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around May 206, the Defendant acquired the above E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) (hereinafter “E”), which was established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling (types, miscellaneouss, shoess, and shoes) around May 2006, the Defendant took over the above Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and completed registration of change for the purpose of wholesale and retail business of functional health foods on May 11, 2006 at the above company: (a) while working as the team leader in the name of K, from the above date and on the victims’ and the Internet homepage of the Luxembourg market, the Defendant took over the entire amount of money from the Plaintiff to the “L self-employed rental store franchise and small store owner” under the name of the victim’s location and the “small-scale rental deposit and the closure of the contract.”

Defendant

On July 2006, at the office of the head office above the 7th floor of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M building, the victim N made a false statement to the victim N that "the person who sells the health functional food (name of the product) that makes the future flag well. The 12 units of the flag are installed and managed by paying the deposit amount of KRW 9.6 million, and if the flag is installed and managed, the 2.4 million won management expenses and the sales will be paid every month. When the contract is terminated, the full deposit will be refunded."

However, even if the security deposit for the installation of the key machine is received, there is no intention or ability to install the key machine, and even if the key machine is installed, there is no intention or ability to pay the key machine management expenses and earnings every month, and there was no intention to refund the key money for the installation of the key machine after the termination of the contract

The defendant is habitually, habitually, in collusion with the above C, by deceiving the victim as above.