Accordingly, the defendant was trying to escape from the victim, and there was no injury to the victim.

Even if it is recognized that the defendant was injured, the act of the defendant constitutes a legitimate act.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, on the grounds that the victim’s statement is consistent, specific, and consistent with the victim’s statement, that the victim’s statement was consistent, F and G’s witness, and that the victim’s statement also conforms with the victim’s statement, and that the Defendant engaged in a necessary injury for treatment between about 14 days and 14 days,

B. In full view of the following facts and circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly investigated and adopted by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim.

1) 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 비교적 일관되게 “ 피고인이 욕설을 하면서 눈을 판다고 손으로 눈 파는 시늉을 하길래 이를 피하려고 고개를 돌렸다.

Then, the defendant laid down his arms with his hand.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “,” and the above statement was considerably detailed about the circumstances surrounding, during, and before, the crime.

2) The witness F of the lower court, who was in the present site and observed the situation from the beginning to the end, stated that the Defendant first expressed the victim’s desire to “to throw away the snow,” and that the victim was “the dead,” thereby putting the Defendant’s bridge.

The Defendant, by one hand, laid down the victim’s hand with approximately three seconds of her son and the other hand.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

The above statements are consistent with the victim's partial statements and facts charged, and F.