2. Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

1. On August 1, 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant damaged the property due to the fact that the Defendant reported the Defendant, who was in the company B and the meals of the company B, to the C District Department at the GM non-Korea restaurant 22 U.S. non-Korean corporation, Inc., the company fees of the company B, and the Defendant reported the Defendant, who was in the company fees, to the C District. As the Defendant was out of B, the Defendant damaged the property by going beyond the victim non-Korean market price owned by the victim non-Korean corporation, Inc., the victim non-Korean corporation, and the victim owned by the victim.

2. Special intimidation Defendant: (a) at the time and place of the preceding paragraph; (b) at the victim B out of the damaged restaurant, two kitchen knife (20 cent in a knife length) which is a dangerous object in which the object in the restaurant was attached to the Defendant; and (c) the victim would have to die of the same knife.

The victim was threatened by Hank-kin drinking D, and the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) (a point of special intimidation) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.