If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

On July 18, 2013, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay a fare even if he/she was on a taxi for business use, requested the victim B to take aboard the taxi in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul to go through the long distance of the road and to arrive at the destination around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant did not pay 18,800 won for the taxi fee to the victim and acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;