사기등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and by a fine of 1,500,000 won.
The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
On September 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the crime of intimidation and the crime of interference with business in the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 3, 2013.
1. Fraud, obstruction of performance of official duties, and obstruction of performance of official duties;
A. On July 7, 2013, around 10:40 on July 7, 2013, the Defendant ordered two soldiers, 1, 1, 2000 if the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in 1013 dong 1308, called “F” restaurant in Gunpo-si E operated by the victim D, who would normally pay the food value.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he received self-determination from the victim due to the lack of money at the time.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, received the victim with a face value of 10,500 won in total and a face value of 10,500 won in the market at that time, and acquired it by deception.
B. On July 7, 2013, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s house, such as the former 11:35 on July 7, 2013, and 112 reported to the effect that “the Defendant would not pay a food value so that he would cause any harm to G, who is an employee of the said restaurant, and brought a mistake in the situation where the military police station H district unit belonging to the above restaurant, which listened to the circumstances leading up to I, and continued to have the above police officer sound “I ambling. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.,
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers I concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
2. To the extent that it is deemed that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the exercise of the right of defense of the accused against fraud, the content of the facts charged is partly revised.
On August 10, 2013, at around 06:58, the Defendant used a private taxi operated by the victimJ to the area adjacent to the 10 apartment complex located in the Mapo-si, Ypo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sin-si, Sinpo-si, and the fact is expressed to pay taxi expenses.