2. As to the method of indecent act in the instant facts charged, the Defendant asserted that the “Defendant”’s “Defendant was “snickbucks to the right bucks” of the F, and that the Defendant did not keep F’s bucks in place from the investigative agency to this court, and that there was no fact that F’s sucks were partially stored in his cellular phone, and that F’s chest was stored.

According to the records, the defendant was on board the bus of 00,000 won in the direction that the defendant can look at the right side of F from the right side of F, and F was around.

It is recognized that any arbucks in the Fbuck by hand can be found that the arbbbbbbbbbbs.

However, the following circumstances found by the record, i.e., that the F has not been viewed as a person who consistently carried out bucks from investigative agencies to this court:

(2) The bus is located on the lower door of the bus;

On the right side of F, it cannot be readily concluded that a large number of people except the Defendant is the Defendant, even though the Defendant was suckbucks that the Defendant had a sprink in the rear side of F and another male is pushed ahead with each other, and (3) as seen earlier, the Defendant consistently asserts that there is no fact that the Fbucks spucks were spucks. In light of the above facts acknowledged and the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant was buckbucks of F, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise. Thus, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no evidence of crime, and thus, the Defendant was acquitted by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 58 of the Criminal Act.